Tuesday, November 28, 2006

In the UK apparently it is not whether, but wither Social Work

Here are some excerpts from an Article in the Guardian dated 27th November 2006

"For some time now there has been concern that social work is a "demographic time bomb" in terms of the nature of the qualified workforce. The influx of recruitment into social work in the 1970s is now nearing retirement and some departments are concerned about losing significant proportions of their qualified and experienced workforce over the next decade.

Recent government recruitment campaigns have targeted social work and social care in an attempt to encourage people to consider this as a worthwhile career.

However, alongside adverts promoting social work are the negative images portrayed by the media both about social workers and the service users they work with. This is highlighted by current government initiatives and media attention regarding young people, "problem families" and refugees and asylum seekers.

Given the lack of respect afforded to such groups themselves, is it any wonder that the social workers trying to support and empower them are likewise undervalued? . . . .

Improving recruitment into social work needs a genuine commitment to enhancing the status of the profession, which in turn requires that government policies reflect an ethical and positive approach to the sections of our society with whom social workers engage. This does not occur in the context of campaigns and policies that marginalise and criminalise those in need of guidance, support and the resources to enable them to lead worthwhile, valued and independent lives. . . . .

Good staff development and a sense of being valued by their employers is crucial to providing an environment in which social workers feel able to manage their work and enhance the knowledge and skills needed to keep up with the ever-changing legal, policy and research context of practice. Management training and development is also key to retention, with good supportive management cited as a significant factor in determining whether they felt positive and valued in their work and organisation."
It would be interesting to speculate about the situation in Australia. I wonder if like the British we undervalue people with the social work skills and their clients? I wonder if all of the workers who were recruited in the 1970s are now really heading into retirement and if so what is the situation with their replacements?

If anyone has some data they would like to share post me a link or some of the information.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Sun, sand, water and safe energy, what more could you want?

Peter's Pen.

Seen as a part of the Guardian's contribution to the debate on global warming and the need to provide the worlds with increasing supplies of energy while causing as little damage as possible here is the following:
Ashley Seager
Monday November 27, 2006
The Guardian


In the desert, just across the Mediterranean sea, is a vast source of energy that holds the promise of a carbon-free, nuclear-free electrical future for the whole of Europe, if not the world.

We are not talking about the vast oil and gas deposits underneath Algeria and Libya, or uranium for nuclear plants, but something far simpler - the sun. And in vast quantities: every year it pours down the equivalent of 1.5m barrels of oil of energy for every square kilometre.

Most people in Britain think of solar power as a few panels on the roof of a house producing hot water or a bit of electricity. But according to two reports prepared for the German government, Europe, the Middle East and North Africa should be building vast solar farms in North Africa's deserts using a simple technology that more resembles using a magnifying glass to burn a hole in a piece of paper than any space age technology.

Two German scientists, Dr Gerhard Knies and Dr Franz Trieb, calculate that covering just 0.5% of the world's hot deserts with a technology called concentrated solar power (CSP) would provide the world's entire electricity needs, with the technology also providing desalinated water to desert regions as a valuable byproduct, as well as air conditioning for nearby cities.

Focusing on Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, they say, Europe should build a new high-voltage direct current electricity grid to allow the easy, efficient transport of electricity from a variety of alternative sources. Britain could put in wind power, Norway hydro, and central Europe biomass and geo-thermal. Together the region could provide all its electricity needs by 2050 with barely any fossil fuels and no nuclear power. This would allow a 70% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity production over the period.

CSP technology is not new. There has been a plant in the Mojave desert in California for the past 15 years. Others are being built in Nevada, southern Spain and Australia. There are different forms of CSP but all share in common the use of mirrors to concentrate the sun's rays on a pipe or vessel containing some sort of gas or liquid that heats up to around 400C (752F) and is used to power conventional steam turbines.

The mirrors are very large and create shaded areas underneath which can be used for horticulture irrigated by desalinated water generated by the plants. The cold water that can also be produced for air conditioning means there are three benefits. "It is this triple use of the energy which really boost the overall energy efficiency of these kinds of plants up to 80% to 90%," says Dr Knies.

This form of solar power is also attractive because the hot liquid can be stored in large vessels which can keep the turbines running for hours after the sun has gone down, avoiding the problems association with other forms of solar power.

Competitive with oil

The German reports put an approximate cost on power derived from CSP. This is now around $50 per barrel of oil equivalent for the cost of building a plant. That cost is likely to fall sharply, to about $20, as the production of the mirrors reaches industrial levels. It is about half the equivalent cost of using the photovoltaic cells that people have on their roofs. So CSP is competitive with oil, currently priced around $60 a barrel.

Dr Knies says CSP is not yet competitive with natural gas for producing electricity alone. But if desalination and air conditioning are added CSP undercuts gas and that is without taking into account the cost of the carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The researchers say a relatively small amount of the world's hot deserts -only about half a percent - would need to be covered in solar collectors to provide the entire world's electrical needs (see map).

The desert land is plentiful and cheap but, more importantly, there is roughly three times as much sunlight in hot deserts as in northern Europe. This is why the reports recommend a collaboration between countries of Europe, the Middle East and Africa to construct a high-voltage direct current (HVDC) grid for the sharing of carbon-free energy. Alternating current cables, which now form the main electricity grids in Europe, are not suitable for long distance transport of electricity because too much is lost on the way. Dr Trieb, of the German Air and Space Agency, says the advantage of DC cables is that the loss in transport is only about 3% per 1,000 kilometres, meaning losses between North Africa and Britain of about 10%.

"Contrary to what is commonly supposed it is entirely feasible, and cost-effective, to transmit solar electricity over long distances. Solar electricity imported to Europe would be amongst the cheapest source of electricity and that includes transporting it," he says. "CSP imports would be much less vulnerable to interruption than are current imports of gas, oil and uranium."

Algeria already exports huge quantities of oil and gas to Europe via pipelines but has a vast potential resource in sunlight that could make it a complete energy supplier to Europe. Many members of the Opec oil cartel, which have worried that alternative energies would kill demand for their oil, are blessed with hot, sunny deserts that could become a further source of energy income.

The two reports make it clear that an HVDC grid around Europe and North Africa could provide enough electricity by 2050 to make it possible to phase out nuclear power and hugely reduce use of fossil fuels.

An umbrella group of scientists has been formed across the region called the Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (Trec) but the idea has yet to excite the imagination of the British government in spite of the recent Stern review on climate change.

Neil Crumpton, renewables specialist at Friends of the Earth, said: "Most politicians on the world stage, particularly Tony Blair and George Bush, appear to have little or no awareness of CSP's potential let alone a strategic vision for using it to help build global energy and climate security."

European commission president José Manuel Barroso said recently that he wanted to see the European Union develop a common energy strategy based on low carbon emissions. The Trec scientists hope German chancellor Angela Merkel will use next year's joint presidency of the EU and Group of Eight leading economies to push for an agreement on a European DC grid and the launch of a widespread CSP programme.

The outlook is not promising. More than 30 countries last week agreed to spend £7bn on an experimental fusion reactor in France which critics say will not produce any electricity for 50 years, if at all.

That amount of money would provide a lot of CSP power, a proven, working and simple technology that would work now, not in 2056.

Safer and cheaper

Dan Lewis, energy expert at the Economic Research Council, calculates that CSP costs $3-5m per installed megawatt, one-fifth the cost of fusion. "Fusion is basically a job creation scheme for plasma physicists."

Mr Crumpton agreed: "Nuclear power accounts for just 3.1% of global energy supply and would be hard pushed to provide more. Yet CSP could supply 30% or 300% of future energy demand far more simply, safely and cost effectively. In the wake of the Stern report the enlightened investment is on hot deserts, not uranium mines or oil wells."

Of course of considerable interest to Australians is the fact that one of the largest and driest continents in the world is not mentioned in the article.

Australia has one of the largest desert environments in the world and given that we also hold one third of the world's uranium, huge deposits of coal and some other energy resources it is distinctly possible that using the same technology that is being suggested by the German scientists Australia could enter a cooperative arrangement with say the Chinese who also have vast tracts of desert in the Gobi and of course anyone else who wants to play and start to stake a monopoly on the provision of energy that is environmentally friendly, completely renewable and will NOT contribute to greenhouse gasses, but instead help Australia to reduce its own emissions and at the same time offer to other countries a trade commodity that does not depend on mining and does not depend on the creation of nuclear fuels that are so incredibly dangerous and waste that is so difficult to get rid of.

Let's hear some real support for this form of energy "mining" and let's use some of the stuff we also have in abundance to create the salt water conversion projects that can help to make our arid land wetter and so exploit the fertility that is currently locked up in land that is either marginal or not farmable because of the lack of water.

That sounds like something I would want to invest in while the Liberals idea of multiple nuclear power plants is something I will try and avoid.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Leading and Managing People

Leading people includes gaining the respect and acceptance of others and inspiring them to follow a certain direction.

Managing people involves achieving results through the work of others

Measures
  1. Ability to identify appropriate direction and purpose for self and others;
  2. Communicate direction and purpose to inspire commitment of others;
  3. Develop plans to ensure that the right people are in the right jobs at the right time;
  4. Identify and provide appropriate learning and development opportunities;
  5. Design work participatively to meet job and people requirements;
  6. Give feedback and manage individual performance;
  7. Use open two way communication and involve others in decisions and problem solving;
  8. Motivate staff and foster innovation, creativity and excellence;
  9. Develop and maintain team harmony and resolve conflict;
  10. Delegate responsibility appropriately;
  11. Manage staff in accordance with organisational regulatory requirements as specified and intended;
  12. Model shared behaviours in the work place.

Learning and Development

The Learning and Development function must be judged primarily by the same criteria as any other kind of management activity, namely its contribution to the efficiency, productivity, profitability and cost effectiveness of the organisation.

Assessment of learning and development must include a measurement of value as well as an identification of results.

Validation of a learning and development program.
A series of tests carried out on the subjects of a learning and development program designed to ascertain whether it has achieved its aim - ie. has it been successful in teaching what it sets out to teach (internal validation) and judged on the basis of its effectiveness, measured against specific yardsticks (such as improvement in quality or quantity of production or reduction in errors) whether the aim itself was realistically based on Learning and Development needs (external validation)

Evaluation
The measurement of the total value of some learning and development program in social as well as financial terms. Evaluation differs from validation in that it attempts to measure the overall cost benefit of the program or course and not just the achievement of its laid down objectives.

Investment Appraisal

If people are "our most valuable assets" then the provision of learning and development could be considered to be an 'investment' in the maintenance and enhancement of those assets. Thus, the money spent on the provision of learning and development should be appraised in a similar way to that used in the appraisal of a physical capital investment.

Value to Whom?
  • to the individual (increased job satisfaction, increased earnings, less stress associated with work performance requirements)
  • to the organisation - increased productivity, morale, prestige
  • to the business as a whole - as against competition from other organisations in a similar business
  • to the nation - eg. as a component of national productivity, higher standards of living etc.
Value against what?
Evaluation must involve some kind of comparison to assess the value of the Learning and Development provided compared with other possibilities.
For example:
  • other learning and development activity or methods
  • no learning and development
  • recruitment of experienced (already fully developed) people
  • spending money elsewhere (for example on new technology to replace some functions)
A process outline

Problem Area or Need

Level 1 Determine what has to be achieved in organisational terms Assess achievement towards organisational objectives
Level 2 Determine what changes of behaviour are therefore required Assess what changes of behaviour have been achieved
Level 3 Determine what has to be learned to bring about changed behaviour Assess what has been learned
Level 4 Design learning situation Assess reaction to learning situation