Sunday, September 30, 2007

More on Aussie values or are they?

Perhaps a "Fair Go" is no longer an Australian value! Check out the web and Google "fair go" - instead of something about Australia you will find a company in New Zealand which is cashing in on what has been featured as a uniquely Australian idea: http://tvnz.co.nz/view/tvone_minisite_index_skin/tvone_fair_go_group

Then again you could always go to site which has an even more interesting view about the notion of a "fair go" namely "Fair Go for Palestine" at http://www.fairgoforpalestine.org/

This site is really a shining example of someone demonstrating their complete lack of understanding about the notion of a "fair go."

It presents (as an example only) the following:
The Ugly Truth from the Horse's Own Mouth


"Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries - all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left."

Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department in 1940. From "A Solution to the Refugee Problem" Joseph Weitz, Davar, September 29, 1967, cited in Uri Davis and Norton Mevinsky, eds., Documents from Israel, 1967-1973, p.21.

Obviously a timely, relevant and current comment. Note the date of this reportage not to mention the heavy sarcasm with which I am reporting it.

A 'Fair Go" could of course also feature (along side of this comment) more recent quotes from people like the President of Iran. Those comments might actually put this issue into a more recent and balanced perspective.

Of course this might be inconvenient. It would show that perhaps there are several ugly truths out there not to mention various horses mouths and certainly a lack of a "fair go" for all of the people in the region!

Perhaps a Cook cartoon in "The Bulletin" sums it all up - have a look for yourself:

http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/cookcartoons/default.aspx?subsectionid=10610&slide=25

Diving in at the deep end

I was watching an interesting program that interviewed some of the world's richest people - people who compete for attention on Forbes Richest 400 list and now more interestingly on a list of the most generous people in the world.

Some of these people give away multiple BILLIONS of dollars to what one reporter described as "charities".

Interestingly enough, and without critiquing the way in which such money is provided, almost all of these rich people were concerned about ensuring that they received value for money spent (or as one person put it) invested.

I wonder whether in their concern for outcomes or value for money any of them have actually given some consideration to the question of putting their expertise to work as part of the deal?

"What expertise" you may well ask - to which the answer is, their entrepreneurial expertise.

What if, for example, these rich "investors" actually created a company which featured as 'shareholders' anyone who paid taxes in a country and actually "purchased" an entire country and ran it like a business?

I would be really interested to see (at a distance I add quickly) how well this application of entrepreneurial management styles would actually work when the "business" of the corporation took into account the well being of the workers, the shareholders, the consumers, all at the same time.

It would be as interesting an experiment as communism was in it's heyday and probably just as disasterous for all concerned.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

"Australian Values"

I am continually surprised by the stupidity (or is it ignorance) of the current Australian Government and many of it's current crop of public servants.

At a time when they appear to be desperate to win over the electorate in front of an election - they leave themselves vulnerable to critique by spending huge amounts of the taxpayer's money on advertising various services provided by the government - ostensibly as a way of finally telling people what they have been doing for them in the last ten years.

Alas, the campaigns are far too little and far too late.

To compound their stupidity, (in my view) the government is about to introduce a 'citizenship test' which no doubt mimics what is current in the USA, the UK. Once again demonstrating to the Australian, public the attitude of servility and fawning that seems to have crept into Australian politics over the last quarter of a century.

There is ostensibly nothing wrong with the notion of a citizenship test - per se. When it purports to test new immigrants and residents of this country about their understanding of "Australian values" is when I draw the line.

Let's explore some of the issues which are referred to in this test.

As a budding new citizen it is expected that the person undertaking the test will be able to reflect on the notions of "mateship" describe the meaning of the term "fair go" or wax lyrical about the state of egalitarianism in this country.

I wonder how many of the young bureaucrats who have invented this charade of a test have bothered to research the background to these expressions and to the notion of their being part of some nominal set of "Australian values"?

Not many, I suspect.

Perhaps I could give them and the government a hand by referring them to a book entitled "Remember When - Reflections on a changing Australia" by Bruce Elder published by Lothian Books in 2003.

Perhaps they should pay special attention to the few words written about "mateship" that commences on page 180 and ends on page 182.

He also explores the myth of the expression "fair go" from pages 167 - 169 and concludes that "the most likely explanation is that it is nothing more than a corruption of 'a fair show' which seems to have entered the Australian language in the 1880's"

He notes that at around the same time it was also an expression used in that most egalitarian of Australian gambling games - two-up. (now there is an Australian 'value' - gambling - just check out the prevalence of poker machines, casinos and betting on - well betting on anything really!)

He goes on to suggest that it really does not matter about the origins, at the end of the day it was an expression used to refer to a sense of egalitarianism about making the contests of life fair and equitable.

For a society that was created out of unfairness - the English class system and the clear division of officers and convicts in Australia's early days - it was a laudable (albeit romantic) notion to work towards an egalitarian society.

Alas we do not seem to have any stories in our history that seem to add credence to this so called "value".

From the very early days of the settlement in this country we have stories about the bush-rangers who stole from anyone and everyone, the early business men who were eager for every commercial advantage, the graziers who were more interested in buying cheap livestock from their neighbours during droughts rather than offer them some pasture or a hand out.

Things have NOT changed and while we mouth the platitude of "give the poor bloke a fair go mate" we actually do not think too deeply about it.

Indeed reflect on the stories of political and corporate greed of the current century as well as the excesses in the last few years of the last century.

When was the last time you actually read in the papers about someone giving someone else a 'fair go'?

I don't know about most of you, but I mostly read about disadvantage and the ever widening gap between the rich and the poor, the increasing misery for most people as housing becomes more and more unaffordable, the prices of foodstuffs rises, the costs of transport rises and all the while we export the only asset we seem to have left in this country - our mineral wealth - to enable a few - especially the leaders of our industries to make obscene personal fortunes while they they downsize the work force or in some other way set out to maximise their own personal situations at the expense of everyone else - ostensibly in the interest of their shareholders.

Indeed I suspect that like most other modern capitalist societies we have more 'globalised' set of values based on "dog eat dog" or perhaps the more "Australian" comment - "I'm all right Jack!"

Let us not compound our paranoia about those few in our society who are extremists and classify everyone into categories of race or class or religious belief.

Let us TRY and get back to a state in which we welcomed the differences brought about by the migration of people from 100's of different countries that created the cosmopolitan, multi racial and multi cultural Australia we have today.

Let's actually recognise that the nostalgic view of Australia was always a mirage.

We never did have an Australia that was wedded to the rural landscape in spite of the love affair we have with the so called "sunburnt country a land of sweeping plains etc" - especially with most of the population ALWAYS just barely hugging the coast lines.

If we ever did have so called "Bronzed Aussies" - let's remember that these are now the people with skin cancer who were too stupid or ignorant to wear sun-block.

Let's not cherish the days of the "blokes" whose main expression of Australian values was the 'piss up' at the pub and the mauling of any 'sheila' they could get their hands on!

Let's value instead the gains we have made from cultural diversity.

Where would be if the Italians had not brought their version of coffee to Australia! Still sipping tea? What would be our most popular foodstuff? Certainly not the spaghetti bolognaise that appears to tip the surveys as the most popular food!

Don't get me wrong folks there are SOME Australian values I do miss.

I miss the Aussie Burger with lettuce, beetroot, tomato and real chips made from fresh potatoes, I miss apricots and peaches that actually had taste I even miss the old 'chip buttie'.

THESE were Aussie values to be treasured!

Sunday, September 23, 2007

F.I.R.S.T. - What you can do with the boss from Hell!

  • Ever had a boss that you think is doing nothing else all day, but picking on just YOU?
  • Ever had a boss that thinks that you can do nothing right?
  • Ever had a boss who makes your life a living misery by criticising you?

Then before you leave the job try F.I.R.S.T.

This acronym comes from a book discussed in an article at PalmBeachPost.com entitled Bullying bosses turn dream jobs into nightmares. It's a key component of a book by Shaun Belding called Winning With the Boss From Hell: A Guide to Life in the Trenches.
  1. F – Fly under the radar. Try not to make yourself a target for your boss.
  2. I – Ignore what your boss is saying by reframing his or her behavior. The example given is that instead of thinking that a boss is picky, look at it as a boss who desires perfection.
  3. R – Retrain the boss by offering your own reinforcement for positive behavior when it comes.
  4. S – Stand your ground when it is appropriate and without breaking any company rules.
  5. T – Talk turkey to your boss when you feel you can take the risk without anything coming back against you.
The basic assumptions underlying the contents of the article and the book seem to focus on the boss and while it is true that there are managers who seem to spend their days doing nothing else, but criticising their staff, just occasionally one of these bosses may actually have something to complain about!

There is something to be said for an employee actually spending a little time exploring his/her own behaviour first and trying F.I.R.S.T. only as a second option

It might be useful to consider whether commentary directed about YOUR work could possibly have at least a grain or two of truth associated with it.

I have come across noxious bosses, I have also come across people:
  • who simply will not listen to direction,
  • who have an uncanny knack for stuffing up everything they lay their hands on
  • who are present in the work place simply to count the hours until they can get home and
  • who actually believe that their employer OWES them a living simply because they turn up at work each day!
I have no problem with the advice provided in the acronym F.I.R.S.T.

However first, I think an employee would be better off looking at his/her own behaviour and the outcomes of their work and asking the question: - "Could the boss have a point?"

If the answer is YES, then fix the problem - ie what you are doing or how you are doing it!

If the answer is NO then and only then try F.I.R.S.T.

Monday, September 10, 2007

APEC and it's aftermath

I was really shocked to see the TV coverage of some poor chap who popped out of his home at Bondi Beach to get a coffee, croissant and the morning paper was accosted by the police as he tried (in vain it seems) to get back to his home!

It appears that he did not have any ID with him and of course the wives of the APEC delegates were having breakfast nearby and were 'protected' by a temporary cordon of Sydney's finest.

In a country in which one of the joys is that you do NOT have to carry ID around with you all day it was a revelation of how things have changed!

I cannot imagine what it would be like to pop out for a brief time in my T shirt, shorts and thongs just carrying enough change for a quick breakfast and then being accosted by police who demand to see my ID when all I am trying to do is to get back to my home!

If you are somewhat "over" the fuss and bother about the "APEC show" and you no longer even watch the news for the first ten minutes or so because all it contains is more rubbish about the "glorious outcomes" of the APEC visit or some even more trite "beat up" about the protests that have been silenced or channelled into 'safe zones' or the traffic chaos that is caused by thousands of taxpayer funded bureaucrats from Australia and abroad who have taken over the city and actually prevented the taxpayers who fund them, from earning a living, then you would not even realise that the wives of the dignitaries escorted by the wife of our current PM were taking over one of the most iconic spots in Sydney - Bondi Beach.

Let's hope that our "honoured guests" leave Australia soon and allow life to start a return to normal.

Let's also hope that those of us who remember a gentler and more open society keep that awareness alive and when it comes to elections reward our politicians and our bureaucrats with an appropriate message about their term in office.

Let that be the lesson from this APEC conference and perhaps give new meaning to the acronym APEC like "Australian People Expecting Change"