Tuesday, November 28, 2006

In the UK apparently it is not whether, but wither Social Work

Here are some excerpts from an Article in the Guardian dated 27th November 2006

"For some time now there has been concern that social work is a "demographic time bomb" in terms of the nature of the qualified workforce. The influx of recruitment into social work in the 1970s is now nearing retirement and some departments are concerned about losing significant proportions of their qualified and experienced workforce over the next decade.

Recent government recruitment campaigns have targeted social work and social care in an attempt to encourage people to consider this as a worthwhile career.

However, alongside adverts promoting social work are the negative images portrayed by the media both about social workers and the service users they work with. This is highlighted by current government initiatives and media attention regarding young people, "problem families" and refugees and asylum seekers.

Given the lack of respect afforded to such groups themselves, is it any wonder that the social workers trying to support and empower them are likewise undervalued? . . . .

Improving recruitment into social work needs a genuine commitment to enhancing the status of the profession, which in turn requires that government policies reflect an ethical and positive approach to the sections of our society with whom social workers engage. This does not occur in the context of campaigns and policies that marginalise and criminalise those in need of guidance, support and the resources to enable them to lead worthwhile, valued and independent lives. . . . .

Good staff development and a sense of being valued by their employers is crucial to providing an environment in which social workers feel able to manage their work and enhance the knowledge and skills needed to keep up with the ever-changing legal, policy and research context of practice. Management training and development is also key to retention, with good supportive management cited as a significant factor in determining whether they felt positive and valued in their work and organisation."
It would be interesting to speculate about the situation in Australia. I wonder if like the British we undervalue people with the social work skills and their clients? I wonder if all of the workers who were recruited in the 1970s are now really heading into retirement and if so what is the situation with their replacements?

If anyone has some data they would like to share post me a link or some of the information.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Sun, sand, water and safe energy, what more could you want?

Peter's Pen.

Seen as a part of the Guardian's contribution to the debate on global warming and the need to provide the worlds with increasing supplies of energy while causing as little damage as possible here is the following:
Ashley Seager
Monday November 27, 2006
The Guardian


In the desert, just across the Mediterranean sea, is a vast source of energy that holds the promise of a carbon-free, nuclear-free electrical future for the whole of Europe, if not the world.

We are not talking about the vast oil and gas deposits underneath Algeria and Libya, or uranium for nuclear plants, but something far simpler - the sun. And in vast quantities: every year it pours down the equivalent of 1.5m barrels of oil of energy for every square kilometre.

Most people in Britain think of solar power as a few panels on the roof of a house producing hot water or a bit of electricity. But according to two reports prepared for the German government, Europe, the Middle East and North Africa should be building vast solar farms in North Africa's deserts using a simple technology that more resembles using a magnifying glass to burn a hole in a piece of paper than any space age technology.

Two German scientists, Dr Gerhard Knies and Dr Franz Trieb, calculate that covering just 0.5% of the world's hot deserts with a technology called concentrated solar power (CSP) would provide the world's entire electricity needs, with the technology also providing desalinated water to desert regions as a valuable byproduct, as well as air conditioning for nearby cities.

Focusing on Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, they say, Europe should build a new high-voltage direct current electricity grid to allow the easy, efficient transport of electricity from a variety of alternative sources. Britain could put in wind power, Norway hydro, and central Europe biomass and geo-thermal. Together the region could provide all its electricity needs by 2050 with barely any fossil fuels and no nuclear power. This would allow a 70% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity production over the period.

CSP technology is not new. There has been a plant in the Mojave desert in California for the past 15 years. Others are being built in Nevada, southern Spain and Australia. There are different forms of CSP but all share in common the use of mirrors to concentrate the sun's rays on a pipe or vessel containing some sort of gas or liquid that heats up to around 400C (752F) and is used to power conventional steam turbines.

The mirrors are very large and create shaded areas underneath which can be used for horticulture irrigated by desalinated water generated by the plants. The cold water that can also be produced for air conditioning means there are three benefits. "It is this triple use of the energy which really boost the overall energy efficiency of these kinds of plants up to 80% to 90%," says Dr Knies.

This form of solar power is also attractive because the hot liquid can be stored in large vessels which can keep the turbines running for hours after the sun has gone down, avoiding the problems association with other forms of solar power.

Competitive with oil

The German reports put an approximate cost on power derived from CSP. This is now around $50 per barrel of oil equivalent for the cost of building a plant. That cost is likely to fall sharply, to about $20, as the production of the mirrors reaches industrial levels. It is about half the equivalent cost of using the photovoltaic cells that people have on their roofs. So CSP is competitive with oil, currently priced around $60 a barrel.

Dr Knies says CSP is not yet competitive with natural gas for producing electricity alone. But if desalination and air conditioning are added CSP undercuts gas and that is without taking into account the cost of the carbon emissions from fossil fuels. The researchers say a relatively small amount of the world's hot deserts -only about half a percent - would need to be covered in solar collectors to provide the entire world's electrical needs (see map).

The desert land is plentiful and cheap but, more importantly, there is roughly three times as much sunlight in hot deserts as in northern Europe. This is why the reports recommend a collaboration between countries of Europe, the Middle East and Africa to construct a high-voltage direct current (HVDC) grid for the sharing of carbon-free energy. Alternating current cables, which now form the main electricity grids in Europe, are not suitable for long distance transport of electricity because too much is lost on the way. Dr Trieb, of the German Air and Space Agency, says the advantage of DC cables is that the loss in transport is only about 3% per 1,000 kilometres, meaning losses between North Africa and Britain of about 10%.

"Contrary to what is commonly supposed it is entirely feasible, and cost-effective, to transmit solar electricity over long distances. Solar electricity imported to Europe would be amongst the cheapest source of electricity and that includes transporting it," he says. "CSP imports would be much less vulnerable to interruption than are current imports of gas, oil and uranium."

Algeria already exports huge quantities of oil and gas to Europe via pipelines but has a vast potential resource in sunlight that could make it a complete energy supplier to Europe. Many members of the Opec oil cartel, which have worried that alternative energies would kill demand for their oil, are blessed with hot, sunny deserts that could become a further source of energy income.

The two reports make it clear that an HVDC grid around Europe and North Africa could provide enough electricity by 2050 to make it possible to phase out nuclear power and hugely reduce use of fossil fuels.

An umbrella group of scientists has been formed across the region called the Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (Trec) but the idea has yet to excite the imagination of the British government in spite of the recent Stern review on climate change.

Neil Crumpton, renewables specialist at Friends of the Earth, said: "Most politicians on the world stage, particularly Tony Blair and George Bush, appear to have little or no awareness of CSP's potential let alone a strategic vision for using it to help build global energy and climate security."

European commission president José Manuel Barroso said recently that he wanted to see the European Union develop a common energy strategy based on low carbon emissions. The Trec scientists hope German chancellor Angela Merkel will use next year's joint presidency of the EU and Group of Eight leading economies to push for an agreement on a European DC grid and the launch of a widespread CSP programme.

The outlook is not promising. More than 30 countries last week agreed to spend £7bn on an experimental fusion reactor in France which critics say will not produce any electricity for 50 years, if at all.

That amount of money would provide a lot of CSP power, a proven, working and simple technology that would work now, not in 2056.

Safer and cheaper

Dan Lewis, energy expert at the Economic Research Council, calculates that CSP costs $3-5m per installed megawatt, one-fifth the cost of fusion. "Fusion is basically a job creation scheme for plasma physicists."

Mr Crumpton agreed: "Nuclear power accounts for just 3.1% of global energy supply and would be hard pushed to provide more. Yet CSP could supply 30% or 300% of future energy demand far more simply, safely and cost effectively. In the wake of the Stern report the enlightened investment is on hot deserts, not uranium mines or oil wells."

Of course of considerable interest to Australians is the fact that one of the largest and driest continents in the world is not mentioned in the article.

Australia has one of the largest desert environments in the world and given that we also hold one third of the world's uranium, huge deposits of coal and some other energy resources it is distinctly possible that using the same technology that is being suggested by the German scientists Australia could enter a cooperative arrangement with say the Chinese who also have vast tracts of desert in the Gobi and of course anyone else who wants to play and start to stake a monopoly on the provision of energy that is environmentally friendly, completely renewable and will NOT contribute to greenhouse gasses, but instead help Australia to reduce its own emissions and at the same time offer to other countries a trade commodity that does not depend on mining and does not depend on the creation of nuclear fuels that are so incredibly dangerous and waste that is so difficult to get rid of.

Let's hear some real support for this form of energy "mining" and let's use some of the stuff we also have in abundance to create the salt water conversion projects that can help to make our arid land wetter and so exploit the fertility that is currently locked up in land that is either marginal or not farmable because of the lack of water.

That sounds like something I would want to invest in while the Liberals idea of multiple nuclear power plants is something I will try and avoid.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Leading and Managing People

Leading people includes gaining the respect and acceptance of others and inspiring them to follow a certain direction.

Managing people involves achieving results through the work of others

Measures
  1. Ability to identify appropriate direction and purpose for self and others;
  2. Communicate direction and purpose to inspire commitment of others;
  3. Develop plans to ensure that the right people are in the right jobs at the right time;
  4. Identify and provide appropriate learning and development opportunities;
  5. Design work participatively to meet job and people requirements;
  6. Give feedback and manage individual performance;
  7. Use open two way communication and involve others in decisions and problem solving;
  8. Motivate staff and foster innovation, creativity and excellence;
  9. Develop and maintain team harmony and resolve conflict;
  10. Delegate responsibility appropriately;
  11. Manage staff in accordance with organisational regulatory requirements as specified and intended;
  12. Model shared behaviours in the work place.

Learning and Development

The Learning and Development function must be judged primarily by the same criteria as any other kind of management activity, namely its contribution to the efficiency, productivity, profitability and cost effectiveness of the organisation.

Assessment of learning and development must include a measurement of value as well as an identification of results.

Validation of a learning and development program.
A series of tests carried out on the subjects of a learning and development program designed to ascertain whether it has achieved its aim - ie. has it been successful in teaching what it sets out to teach (internal validation) and judged on the basis of its effectiveness, measured against specific yardsticks (such as improvement in quality or quantity of production or reduction in errors) whether the aim itself was realistically based on Learning and Development needs (external validation)

Evaluation
The measurement of the total value of some learning and development program in social as well as financial terms. Evaluation differs from validation in that it attempts to measure the overall cost benefit of the program or course and not just the achievement of its laid down objectives.

Investment Appraisal

If people are "our most valuable assets" then the provision of learning and development could be considered to be an 'investment' in the maintenance and enhancement of those assets. Thus, the money spent on the provision of learning and development should be appraised in a similar way to that used in the appraisal of a physical capital investment.

Value to Whom?
  • to the individual (increased job satisfaction, increased earnings, less stress associated with work performance requirements)
  • to the organisation - increased productivity, morale, prestige
  • to the business as a whole - as against competition from other organisations in a similar business
  • to the nation - eg. as a component of national productivity, higher standards of living etc.
Value against what?
Evaluation must involve some kind of comparison to assess the value of the Learning and Development provided compared with other possibilities.
For example:
  • other learning and development activity or methods
  • no learning and development
  • recruitment of experienced (already fully developed) people
  • spending money elsewhere (for example on new technology to replace some functions)
A process outline

Problem Area or Need

Level 1 Determine what has to be achieved in organisational terms Assess achievement towards organisational objectives
Level 2 Determine what changes of behaviour are therefore required Assess what changes of behaviour have been achieved
Level 3 Determine what has to be learned to bring about changed behaviour Assess what has been learned
Level 4 Design learning situation Assess reaction to learning situation

Mentoring - Understanding the Choices

One of the difficulties new mentors have is the feeling that they need a "road map". One of the features of mentor induction most appreciated is the prersentation by a mentor or a mentor and mentee about "how we did it". I recommend such presentations, but there is also a risk that new mentors think they have the road map.

Mentoring Dimensions

Formal Informal
e.g. Fixed roles - "mentor" is always the mentor,
Note and review agreements/action points at end of meeting
e.g. Roles swap at times, No sharing of notes or no notes taken

Structured Unstructured
e.g. Work to an agenda for a meeting, work to a plan over time
e.g. Begin meeting with what is on mind of mentee and take it from there

Fixed Term Open Ended
Mentor and mentee know when mentoring will end
Mentoring has no defined end date

Advice Giver Facilitator
e.g. Shares expertise, telling e.g. Assists mentee to draw own conclusions from reviewing what they know and how they feel, questioning

Only Resource Finder
Mentor is the only resource made available Mentor puts mentee in touch with others who can assist development and aspirations

Presenting Problems Wider Issues
e.g. Focus is on seeking solutions to presenting problems, determining actions, making decisions, "Discussion" e.g. Exploring how mentee's values and other beliefs relate to the issues they bring, Working to develop self-insight, "Dialogue"

Disclosing Own Experiences Non-disclosing
e.g. Readily share relevant examples of how you succeeded or failed and lessons learned.
e.g. No references to own experiences.
Focus on what mentee experiences and how mentee deals with this.

Personal Focus Professional Focus
e.g. Work with mentee to check her / his aspirations or actions against personal values. Consider how pursuit of one thing may impact on other areas of life, including private life.
e.g. Discuss issues without reference to their relationship to mentee's personal values.

Work Venues Social Venues
e.g. Always meet in work environment. e.g. Some or all meetings in social environments - café / bar / home

Friendship Working Relationship
e.g. Enjoy deep friendship as well as being a mentoring pair and feel comfortable with this level of intimacy.
e.g. The relationship stops short of intimate friendship but both feel it is human, warm and useful.

These choices are not right or wrong. There are intermediate positions on the dimensions. One side is not better or more preferable than the other is. An interesting exercise is to go to one side of a dimension and ask in what situation would this choice be more appropriate. Then to go to the other side and ask the same question.

Whether a choice is useful depends on both the mentor and mentee, the context or scheme in which they meet, how their relationship develops and their needs at the time of a particular meeting.

A key role for mentors is to use judgement and instinct as to how best to meet the needs of the mentee while recognising their own unique qualities.

Factors Impacting On Choices In Mentoring
· Degree of trust
· Personalities
· Access to other relevant resources
· Quality of communication / understanding
· Degree of self-awareness / readiness to examine self
· Values beliefs
. Life experience
· Expectations
· Time available
· Courage
· Skills
· Confidence

Saturday, November 25, 2006

Will this resolve the conflict over who owns Jerusalem?

4,000-Year-Old Tombs Found Near Jerusalem Mall
Mati Milstein
for National Geographic News
November 21, 2006

"Not far from Jerusalem, Israel's biggest shopping mall, builders accidentally uncovered a 4,000-year-old cemetery last summer. This month the ancient site began yielding jewelry, armaments, and ritual offerings.

The cemetery find suggests that the Canaanites—a Semitic people who inhabited ancient Palestine and Phoenicia beginning about 5,000 years ago—had a much more extensive settlement in the city than previously thought."
Pete's Points:

I like this news. It should assist well meaning Israelis and Palestinians to resolve one of the major issues that have burdened discussions and negotiations between the parties about ownership of the land in Jerusalem.

Neither side owns it. It belongs to the descendants of the Canaanites who lived there - unless of course anyone is prepared to admit that it belongs to the group of people who conquered it last.

If this reality is admitted then those who are there NOW have the final claim to ownership unless they themselves are ousted.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

CAPTION CONTEST

When I was in Germany I saw this sign and simply HAD to stop and take a photo!

In case the word is not clear it is sozialwerk or social work - the stop sign is universal.

I can just imagine how it got there - a council worker who was in a divorce case was assessed by a social worker and as a consequence of his/her report had to pay out more maintenance to his departing spouse than he thought reasonable.

The sign is his comment on that outcome.

That's MY version of the reason for the sign - anyone else want to have a guess at what it means?

Sunday, November 19, 2006

The new message for workers?

If you are an employer of staff and you want to motivate them to achieve greater per capita productivity there is nothing like this T Shirt message to motivate your people.

To add insult to injury of course, you could always consider adding a sub-text which reads

"If you don't, you may become one of them"

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Musings on Migration

From the ABC:

Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone has welcomed yesterday's High Court ruling that makes it easier for the Federal Government to return temporary protection visa (TPV) holders to their countries of origin.

The High Court decided that the Government is under no obligation to let people on TPVs remain in Australia once the situation in their home country has improved.

Pete's Points:

I was a refugee (albeit some 50 years ago).

My parents feared for their lives and ran with me in tow.

I can understand what it is like to run from a country when you are in fear of your life.

Equally, I understand what it is like to apply for migration to a country as a refugee and to be faced with rejection on grounds that appear meaningless at the time.

In the case of my family, the place of birth of my father enabled him to gain approval from the USA to migrate there and settle as a refugee, but the country of my birth and that of my mother precluded us from the same privilege. Why? Our circumstances were the same, at least from our perspective.

The country concerned had a policy of permitting only a certain number of people who were born in different countries to migrate and because of the large numbers involved my mother and I missed out on their quota system.

Unfair? Possibly from some perspectives.

The reality is that each country must have the right to decide its own immigration policies regardless of whether potential applicants for residence welcome that policy or not.

It was of course possible for my father to have migrated to the USA and then when he had settled there to send for my mother and myself some time down the track. He chose a different option. He decided not to split the family and risk something happening to us in a refugee camp.

When Australia offered to take us all in we migrated here. A then strange land where we did not know the language or the culture and which was a world away from where we expected to end up.

Personally I think my dad made a great decision, if not for himself, then certainly for his family.

I can understand why it is that the government has fought so hard to ensure that people to whom they give TEMPORARY protection can be returned to their home countries when the conditions there change for the better and it is felt that they are no longer likely to suffer harm.

If and when Australia affords someone the opportunity to migrate to this country as a refugee and were then to withdraw their privilege to settle here, I would be up in arms alog side the Greens and the Democrats.

However when it is made clear to someone that he or she is being given TEMPORARY protection only and there is no intention at any time to admit them to Australia under any other condition then the individual concerned has to make a choice, just like my father had to make a choice, about what to do.

Once the choice is made there are consequences that follow the choice, one of these being, in the case of a temporary residence visa, that if the country from which you have fled returns to a state where you no longer have to fear for your life you are returned there.

There are other choices for people out there when they are in danger. They need simply to be careful about the course of action that they choose. In the case of the people who were the subject of the case before the High Court they clearly did not choose the correct option for themselves.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Are you for ONE side or the other?

I find it continually interesting to read or listen to the media report items from the middle east.

Whenever there is a rocket launched at an Israeli town or settlement and people are killed they are very rarely described in the media as 'innocent civilians'. Nor does there seem to be any reporting about the Palestinian government's views (whether it is the Fatah or the Hamas faction) on the tragic loss of life and property brought about by the actions of some of their followers.

On the other hand whenever there is an attack by Israeli troops on targets in the Gaza strip or indeed elsewhere in what have become known as 'the occupied territories' and people are killed or wounded, these attacks are condemned and held up to be a violation of human rights, the involvement of the UN is sought etc.

In other words there is a huge media beat up.

Similarly whenever there is a weapon that explodes in Iraq killing dozens of people at a time it is reported in a sort of routine way that another x number of people have been killed in location "a" or "b" by either Shiite or Sunni insurgents. There is no real outcry about a violation of human rights, a demand for action by the UN, a screaming and crying in the streets for vengeance against the perpetrators and so on.

Let the killing be the fault or responsibility of the "occupiers" (pick any group of soldiers from any country that is in Iraq) and all of a sudden you have media headline plastered all over every type of medium crying in bold print about the 'outrage' perpetrated by the military of (insert the name of the country concerned) .

I have to say that I am impressed with both the gullibility of the media and the extent to which propagandists on the side of Islamic terrorist groups have learned to manipulate the channels of communication.

At what point are people going to wake up to the fact that death and destruction are brutal and seemingly unavoidable facts of life, whenever there are uncontrolled weapons in the hands of militants anywhere in the world. Militants who have a political agenda that is contrary to the interests and the agenda of others who live side by side with them?

I know that unfair reporting sells papers and advertising because people hungry for news will read the most sensational reportage they can lay their hands on.

That said, there are some bigger issues for people to consider. One being, whether or not we are going to continue to believe either side's propaganda or actually ask some deeper questions about what is really going on.

Friday, November 10, 2006

The next step?

One of the more interesting questions that arises as a result of the success of the Democrats in the US Congress is how the Defense Secretary was finally assisted with his "career development."

It seems that 'falling on his own sword,' the colourful quote attributed to Donald Rumsfeld by the media on at least one Australian TV channel is less likely than a more truthful version of this reality namely that he resigned rather than face the beating that he would be given had he stayed in office. This Defense Secretary holds the record at present for having been both the youngest and the oldest person ever to have occupied this office. No doubt it will be the feature article in his memoirs.

Then there is the new question before the house namely: what on earth prompted the former CIA director to offer to put his head in the noose and replace him?

I await with bated breath the revelations about this story as it no doubt will emerge from the press. The story I have heard to date, namely that he is a man devoted to public service and has stepped in to do his duty rings about as hollow as any story I have heard to date.

I mean, a former CIA director with a conscience and a devotion to public service?

I guess stranger things have happened - but not in my lifetime!

Saturday, November 04, 2006

Mission Impossible 4?


· Cruise to take control of legendary United Artists
· Comeback for actor who's career was written off


Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Friday November 3, 2006
The Guardian


In a move that had Hollywood insiders scratching their heads in bemusement, it was announced yesterday that the actor Tom Cruise is to take over the dormant United Artists film studio.

United Artists was started in 1919 by four of the biggest figures in film: Charlie Chaplin, Douglas Fairbanks, Mary Pickford and DW Griffith. As the name suggests, it was an attempt to wrest creative control of film-making from the financiers and deliver it to the artists themselves.

An Own Goal? Stupidity or a Come on?

I have seen a lot of own goals when I look at soccer matches but never before have I seen one this good:

"The US Government posted Iraqi documents on the Internet that explain how to build a nuclear bomb, The New York Times reported on its website on Friday.

The Times said that officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency had complained to US officials last week about the postings of "roughly a dozen" documents from Iraq's pre-1991 nuclear research that contained diagrams, equations and other details for making a nuclear bomb.

The newspaper cited experts who said the documents "constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb".

The US Government posted the bomb-related documents on a website set up last March to make available to the public a huge archive of Iraqi Government papers, hoping that the public would help sift through the archive for useful information that Government translators did not have time to search for."

If true, then it's time that some US officials actually lost their jobs for stuff like this. Talk about making it easy for your friendly neighbourhood terrorists.

Then again I have to remember that the US government has a whole department given over to psychological operations. I wonder if this is a scam?

Let's hand the terrorists some plans that will help them to blow themselves up and take a few of their mates with them when they do.

Interesting question.

I find it hard to believe that the US government that spends trillions of dollars on all sorts of trivia does not have enough translators or cannot hire enough translators to get through their paperwork and have to rely on public help for something like this.

What an opportunity.

This in from Papua New Guinea:
"The Papua New Guinea (PNG) Government says it can survive without the $300 million aid package it receives from Australia."
Pete's Points:

If this is how the PNG government wants to play, I say let them lose our aid.

The taxpayers of Australia have better things to do with $300 million a year than pay it over to ungrateful recipients.

Let's spend it on getting some desalination plants into existence near our major population centers so that all the water we have surrounding this island does not go to waste! Alternately let's spend it on increasing the number of renewable energy initiatives we have in train.

If and when the PNG government does get bogged down in its own corruption or has more riots and lawlessness resulting in more death and an increase in poverty, then the population there may wish to have a change of government or even a change of attitude towards its neighbour in the south.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Why I have been "off line"

Have you ever had one of those days when you are somewhat off colour? When the world no longer seems shiny and bright and new?

If not then you will have no idea what I am talking about. If you have then you will appreciate that for the last few days I have had no real desire to find, much less hit the keys on the computer with any news.

A little rain yesterday has not changed things. Perhaps next week.

However seeing Joe Hockey the Minister for DHS on the Channel 7 early morning program today talking about the efforts that his department was taking to reduce greenhouse emissions by building another monster headquarters building for Centrelink caught my attention. He has actually invited Channel 7 staff to come and visit the building before it is even finished being built.

I will be interested to hear from readers when the building opens how wonderful (or not) it is.

I certainly hope that they will enjoy the 49.5 million dollars of furbishing that Parliament voted for the building and I hope that the windows are double glazed so that the heat of the sun can be captured and used to power either the cooling or the heating systems that are usually required in Canberra to handle the extremes of the heat of the summer and the cold of the winter.

I look forward to seeing the Channel 7 crew being given the "Hockey" tour of the building in the next few weeks. I also wonder how much it will cost to brief the Minister and his entourage as well as the media that will no doubt be invited to attend.